<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>dria - Latest Comments in Digital kids and the death of email</title><link>http://dria.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://dria.disqus.com/digital_kids_and_the_death_of_email/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 15:17:05 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Digital kids and the death of email</title><link>http://www.dria.org/wordpress/archives/2007/07/18/585/#comment-1567877</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I don't think there's much of a risk to email.  Email has a few giant advantages that social networks just can't compete with:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;1.  Nobody owns it.  MySpace, Facebook are all at whim of their owners.  They can be snooped, modified, crippled, disabled, limited, etc.&lt;br&gt;2.  Email is secure.  Email can be done 100% internal (Exchange) or external.&lt;br&gt;3.  Email is manageable.  It can be sent to many devices, filters, storage mechanisms.  MySpace, Facebook, etc. are all 100% web based, and the org (or individual has no control).&lt;br&gt;4.  Email is universal.  This STILL isn't the case with IM.  You still can't IM across networks.  Social networks have the same thing.  No 1 will become dominant.  Hasn't happened for search after all those years, not for IM, ISP, or anything else they predicted will have 1 winner.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Robert Accettura</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 15:17:05 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>