<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>dria - Latest Comments in Help verify some bustage?</title><link>http://dria.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://dria.disqus.com/help_verify_some_bustage/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 15:47:42 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Help verify some bustage?</title><link>http://www.dria.org/wordpress/archives/2006/04/26/410/#comment-1567718</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Cool thanks guys. I’ll test Bill’s proposed fix shortly...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Almanca tercüman</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 15:47:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Help verify some bustage?</title><link>http://www.dria.org/wordpress/archives/2006/04/26/410/#comment-1567717</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Microsoft's Markus Mielke says the bug is fixed :)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://design-noir.de/log/2006/04/internet-explorer-7-beta-2-veroeffentlicht/#comment-20" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://design-noir.de/log/2006/04/internet-explorer-7-beta-2-veroeffentlicht/#comment-20"&gt;http://design-noir.de/log/2...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dao</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 31 May 2006 12:23:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Help verify some bustage?</title><link>http://www.dria.org/wordpress/archives/2006/04/26/410/#comment-1567716</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Dao: your float:left; fix works.  Thanks a million :)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;'Course I still have to test in all the other browsers...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dria</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 27 Apr 2006 11:59:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Help verify some bustage?</title><link>http://www.dria.org/wordpress/archives/2006/04/26/410/#comment-1567715</link><description>&lt;p&gt;IE7 has the same problem with my site's menu:  &lt;a href="http://design-noir.de" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://design-noir.de"&gt;http://design-noir.de&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;IE6 had this too. That's why you added a workaround (_width: 1%). But IE7 won't recognize _width (which is correct).&lt;br&gt;#navigation #contenttypes li a { float: left; } would do the trick. But I suggest you leave it as it is and ask Microsoft to fix this ancient CSS1 bug.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dao</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 27 Apr 2006 11:50:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Help verify some bustage?</title><link>http://www.dria.org/wordpress/archives/2006/04/26/410/#comment-1567714</link><description>&lt;p&gt;[sorry for reposting but some my text was handled as real anchor tags while it's not]&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Just don't use height and line-height for [A] element inside navigation (in common case I usually use vertical padding instead of height + line-height).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;But it's definitely a BUG of IE7b2 that DOESN'T NEED for any workaround and should be reported to Microsoft and fixed by IE programmers before final IE7 ships.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;P. S. Removing _width doesn't change nothing for me. But to make links clickable at its whole area (that probably is the aim of using _width: 1%) I usually use "Star HTML" hack with 1px height for [A] element. That hack now (since IE7 ignore it in strict mode) is a good way to address CSS rules (that are workaroud of bugs that are NOT longer takes place in IE7) separately for IE5-6 and IE7.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MT</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 27 Apr 2006 11:21:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Help verify some bustage?</title><link>http://www.dria.org/wordpress/archives/2006/04/26/410/#comment-1567713</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Just don't use height and line-height for &lt;a&gt; element inside navigation (in common case I usually use vertical padding instead of height + line-height).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But it's definitely a BUG of IE7b2 that DOESN'T NEED for any workaround and should be reported to Microsoft and fixed by IE programmers before final IE7 ships.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;P. S. Removing _width doesn't change nothing for me. But to make links clickable at its whole area (that probably is the aim of using _width: 1%) I usually use "Star HTML" hack with 1px height for &lt;/a&gt;&lt;a&gt; element. That hack now (since IE7 ignore it in strict mode) is a good way to address CSS rules (that are workaroud of bugs that are NOT longer takes place in IE7) separately for IE5-6 and IE7.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MT</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 27 Apr 2006 11:19:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Help verify some bustage?</title><link>http://www.dria.org/wordpress/archives/2006/04/26/410/#comment-1567712</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think the _xxxxxx aer IEisms. Our Web designer once told me that alot of CSS hacks he uses make use of this "feature". IE(6) will make use of _xxxx attributes while Firefox ignores them. He can then manage to get pages to behave identically (or close to it) on IE and FF.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;BOCICBW (but  of course, I could be wrong).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;L&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Laurent</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 27 Apr 2006 09:29:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Help verify some bustage?</title><link>http://www.dria.org/wordpress/archives/2006/04/26/410/#comment-1567711</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Deb, I confirm that there are layout problems of the navigation links when using the latest IE 7 beta 2 build 5346.5.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Note that the javascript console report CSS parsing errors:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;#navigation #personal a {&lt;br&gt;	_width: 1%;&lt;br&gt;}&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;_width is not a CSS property.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Warning: Unknown property '_width'.  Declaration dropped.&lt;br&gt;Source File: &lt;a href="http://developer.mozilla.org/css/base.css" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://developer.mozilla.org/css/base.css"&gt;http://developer.mozilla.or...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;Line: 194&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Gérard&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Gérard Talbot</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2006 20:25:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Help verify some bustage?</title><link>http://www.dria.org/wordpress/archives/2006/04/26/410/#comment-1567710</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Cool, thanks guys.  I'll test Bill's proposed fix shortly.  :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dria</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2006 17:40:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Help verify some bustage?</title><link>http://www.dria.org/wordpress/archives/2006/04/26/410/#comment-1567709</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yup there's bustage.  Not sure if I can help with the fix.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rafael</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2006 17:21:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Help verify some bustage?</title><link>http://www.dria.org/wordpress/archives/2006/04/26/410/#comment-1567708</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The problem is the display: block line in the #navigation #contenttypes li a definition in base.css.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Removing that line seems to fix it (playing with a locally saved copy of the page) in IE7b2 without breaking FF 1.5 or IE6.  That said, I don't know what older browser might be using that bit of code and be affected by losing it.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bill Mason</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2006 16:28:04 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>